11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :)

cq842000 · Post by **cq842000** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:40 pm

mikel wrote:Gains on the charger were same as the Chally, 10 rwhp, 15 ft.lbs

The 8 speed did not seem to affect power output but by maybe 2-3 rwhp here and there.

Awesome, thank you for the update, which octane are you guys tuning for when getting these numbers?

-danny · Post by **-danny** » Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:51 am

mikel wrote:Little update...

The Chally picked up nicely, solid 10 rwhp and 15 ft/lbs across the board, and it felt a TON better on the street, despite the minimal power gains

Thanks

Yes it did

So i haven't had the chance to take the car out to a secluded road due to school/work since i picked it up this wednesday, but i've stepped on it a couple times from red light to red light and on the highway (when safe of course..), and the car seems to have woke up real nice, the throttle response is much better imo.
Hopefully i have the chance this weekend to try out some 0-60 runs
Big thanks to Mike and the guys over at Diablosport for making this happen finally

Garza · Post by **Garza** » Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:54 am

mikel wrote:Gains on the charger were same as the Chally, 10 rwhp, 15 ft.lbs

The 8 speed did not seem to affect power output but by maybe 2-3 rwhp here and there.

I got a 2011 Chrysler 300 limited with dynomax x pipe catback exhaust , k&n intakes, and a pretty accurate dyno tester! If you send me a unit and I could help test out for you!! Or I could buy a unit to help out !

cq842000 · Post by **cq842000** » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:08 pm

So were those numbers from the 87 octane preliminary tune?

Post by **mikel** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:09 pm

I need another 11 or 12 Charger or 300, 5 speed or 8 speed, asap, truck is gassed up and ready to go, lemme know!

TheyCallMeMike · Post by **TheyCallMeMike** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:29 pm

I can be there by 9:00 am tomorrow, with 93 in it this time, let me know!

cq842000 · Post by **cq842000** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:30 pm

mikel wrote:I need another 11 or 12 Charger or 300, 5 speed or 8 speed, asap, truck is gassed up and ready to go, lemme know!

I'm notifying the appropriate fella!

TheyCallMeMike wrote:I can be there by 9:00 am tomorrow, with 93 in it this time, let me know!

Damn you're quick!

TheyCallMeMike · Post by **TheyCallMeMike** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:33 pm

LOL I just got on when you sent me the message!

Post by **mikel** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:45 pm

thanks again Mike, see you tomorrow

TheyCallMeMike · Post by **TheyCallMeMike** » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:47 pm

See ya then!

IcyFridge · Post by **IcyFridge** » Wed May 01, 2013 9:43 am

Kudos to you Mike for donating your car.

Looking forward to the 93 results. Hope there's not a lot of pinging as it was with "another company's" tuner on my old JK.

Wondering if the shift points are firmer and if there's a way to eliminate that dreaded VVT torque management completely?

EDIT: I recall the older 3.5 Chargers having a 93CAI tune. Will you be including this in the tuner capabilities or will it have to be downloaded separately? I know that a lot of us 3.6 charger owners are running CAIs.

Post by **mikel** » Mon May 06, 2013 2:11 pm

Done/released/out the door/hasta la pasta/update your tools and enjoy

Thanks Mike!!!!!!

Post by **mikel** » Mon May 06, 2013 3:17 pm

http://www.diablosport.com/forum/viewto ... 13&t=44810

TheyCallMeMike · Post by **TheyCallMeMike** » Mon May 06, 2013 5:56 pm

Thanks for everything guys! Mike Ill send you an email now, so we can go throught the setting of my Tuner!

shadow13 · Post by **shadow13** » Mon May 06, 2013 8:07 pm

would this work on a 2013?

11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :)

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :

Re: 11-12 Charger, 300, Challenger, 3.6 needed for testing :