Diablosport Forums

Mike_Levy wrote:Challengers run on average 12.7-12.8. Occasionally an automatic will run 12.3-12.4. Every CTS-V runs 12.3 or better. And the LSA is made to be built up. We can make 1,000hp on a stock bottom end. And you seem to be forgetting, the 392 still can't be tuned, so it can't be modded properly. The V has none of those problems. Its tunable, its built on the venerable Chevy small block so it'll last virtually forever, parts are plentiful, its a 4 door luxury sedan, doesn't trip over itself, and has the record for Quickest Production Sedan around the Nurburgring. Not to mention is the worlds 2nd fastest sedan at 193mph, trailing just the $300,000 Bentley Flying Spur Speed (201mph).

Don't even bother trying to dig stuff up. The CTS-V is out of the LX/LY's league. It plays with the M5, E63, XFR and other $90-100k European luxury cars, not $40k American ones. Its already been named the best American sedan ever by countless publications, and nothing else even comes close. Chrysler needs to worry about Hyundai, not Cadillac.

SRT8Tech wrote:I gotta post my vid up. I just have to. LOL. Read the whole description in the description part of the vid.
Here is is................I like the track FM station on my radio, enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5oRgzwU-Cg

AND this one is really good. Read the desription again. Ive run a few of these.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayvSRwAa ... re=related

If I could tune it, I would be in the 11's on the stock tire with just a tune alone. But Dodge has to F-us in the A!!!

brandy16 wrote:

Mike_Levy wrote:Challengers run on average 12.7-12.8. Occasionally an automatic will run 12.3-12.4. Every CTS-V runs 12.3 or better. And the LSA is made to be built up. We can make 1,000hp on a stock bottom end. And you seem to be forgetting, the 392 still can't be tuned, so it can't be modded properly. The V has none of those problems. Its tunable, its built on the venerable Chevy small block so it'll last virtually forever, parts are plentiful, its a 4 door luxury sedan, doesn't trip over itself, and has the record for Quickest Production Sedan around the Nurburgring. Not to mention is the worlds 2nd fastest sedan at 193mph, trailing just the $300,000 Bentley Flying Spur Speed (201mph).

Don't even bother trying to dig stuff up. The CTS-V is out of the LX/LY's league. It plays with the M5, E63, XFR and other $90-100k European luxury cars, not $40k American ones. Its already been named the best American sedan ever by countless publications, and nothing else even comes close. Chrysler needs to worry about Hyundai, not Cadillac.

Not every ctsv runs 12.3 but it should. look at the vidio 12.5 motor trend face up to it you spent $20,000 for very little gain

Mike_Levy wrote:Challengers run on average 12.7-12.8. Occasionally an automatic will run 12.3-12.4. Every CTS-V runs 12.3 or better. And the LSA is made to be built up. We can make 1,000hp on a stock bottom end. And you seem to be forgetting, the 392 still can't be tuned, so it can't be modded properly. The V has none of those problems. Its tunable, its built on the venerable Chevy small block so it'll last virtually forever, parts are plentiful, its a 4 door luxury sedan, doesn't trip over itself, and has the record for Quickest Production Sedan around the Nurburgring. Not to mention is the worlds 2nd fastest sedan at 193mph, trailing just the $300,000 Bentley Flying Spur Speed (201mph).

Don't even bother trying to dig stuff up. The CTS-V is out of the LX/LY's league. It plays with the M5, E63, XFR and other $90-100k European luxury cars, not $40k American ones. Its already been named the best American sedan ever by countless publications, and nothing else even comes close. Chrysler needs to worry about Hyundai, not Cadillac.

Mike_Levy wrote:Do yourself a favor, before you try to compare the Chryslers the the CTS-V, or even a base CTS, drive both. I've owned both, I have the wheel time to compare them. You drive a base 5.7 LX. Not in the league of the current LYs, not in the same country of the base CTS, not on the same planet as the SRT8s, and not even in the same galaxy as the CTS-V.

SRT8Tech wrote:Chrysler did a good job on the new 300c but its still no CTS-V. The V is an amazing car. There were 6 LSA V's at the track a few weeks ago. Most were stock and running 12.4's-12.6's @ 114-116 but there were a few modded ones running in the low 11's @ 125's with just minor bolt ons, pulley and tune.

SRT8Tech wrote:Chrysler did a good job on the new 300c but its still no CTS-V. The V is an amazing car. There were 6 LSA V's at the track a few weeks ago. Most were stock and running 12.4's-12.6's @ 114-116 but there were a few modded ones running in the low 11's @ 125's with just minor bolt ons, pulley and tune.