email CMR tune vs can tune
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:17 pm
I see a lot of post on other forums stating that an email tune is better than a can tune from DS even for a stock SRT8 (CAI,exhaust, catch can)
Is this true?
Is this true?
If you had to ask you need to do some more homework to understand what a tune does and what you mean (or will mean) by "better"?2001z06 wrote:I see a lot of post on other forums stating that an email tune is better than a can tune from DS even for a stock SRT8 (CAI,exhaust, catch can)
Is this true?
Sure... ask them why. Their tuner should have told them, and they should have asked. "Just how is your tune different/better than the canned tune?" A good tuner will tell you that, for a basically stock car, they can make little changes here and there to suit your preference but the difference from the canned tunes is not going to be worth the cost.2001z06 wrote:I am trying to find out what makes a email tune better, check out any srt8 forum and you will see guys post that email tunes perform better than can tunes.
You could probably fine tune it to improve *for your particular gas and conditions* but I seriously doubt if you could get anything near 8-10rwhp by doing so. The DS tunes assume very good gas and don't allow for the oil through the PCV if you don't have a catch can. So you might see knock retard with less than that. But the PCM handles that. So you might adjust to eliminate the knock retard and maybe gain 1 or 2rwhp? You can do that with the handheld.I can see it if you had a cam, long tubes...etc but for a stock srt8 how much more can you improve on the timing and A/F ...I figure that if you fine tune your a/f and timing you might get another 8-10rwhp (which is hard to feel)
I think if you reduced TQ management as much as possible (so it still shifted most of the time) then you would start breaking things prematurely. There are other tradeoffs. Lot of people want their shifts to feel like you got hit in the ass with a giant sledge hammer. That may not be the best thing in the mid/long term. Lot of other people are asking for more torque management. So again, I think when you say "better" you are actually talking about preference. DS is going to include a single tune that's going to be "best" (what they think will be preferred by the most people). And they have a single tune for 4 configurations. Octane 1 w/wo CAI&exhaust, Octane 2 w/wo CAI&exhaust.they also mention that shifting is better...why? I would figure DS would of reduced our TQ managemnt as much as possible.
Can you show me someone complaining about our tunes (DCX Depot) being lean and more importantly instances of our mail order tunes causing problems? I would hope you have some concrete examples of this to make such a bold statement. I'm sure if you look hard enough you will find issues people have had on built up combos with possibly a dyno tune that didn't provide the proper results. As with any large build/heavily modified car there are always more opportunities for issues to arise.Mike_Levy wrote:The canned tunes are very conservative, so email CMRs can definetly make a difference. HOWEVER, all are not created equal, and I have heard quite a few horror stories. For instance, DCX Depots tunes are super lean, and tend to cause problems. MHPs tunes feel great, but have quite a bit of KR, and very little actual power gains. Actually that seems to be the norm. The Email CMRs are more "feel" tunes. They may feel better, but theres no real power gained from them.
I'm sure I could simply by doing a search on CherokeeSRT8.com, as thats where I used to spend alot of time and got most of my info. But I rarely go there anymore, so I'm not going to.mdmotorsports wrote:Can you show me someone complaining about our tunes (DCX Depot) being lean and more importantly instances of our mail order tunes causing problems?
No not really. We are discussing email tunes. That is not what he is talking about. KingSavage definitely had issues, and not sure that needs to be discussed here because it's way more involved than the question at hand.Mike_Levy wrote:Well, theres another one for you. And my friend Chris tells me that he knows who said the DCX tunes were lean and not very good. I'm not gonna say who to avoid causing a problem, but lets just say he's among the very best at tuning the Hemis, trailing perhaps only Johan (or maybe not even).