while I appreciate your feedback, it does not make your 'opinion' correct...camo1970 wrote:Mike that's not the point and you know it.
I don't want to pay an additional $200 + bucks for child like gauges and 1/4 mile data, I just want to tune the car and drive it.
The decision for limiting updates to the Trinity first is purley a revenue driven one and one that is in complete contrast to what the customers and market place wants.
You should release updates for both options similtainiously and let the market determine what it wants.
Your website says you want customer feedback, that is mine and I will continue to wait for the update for inTune.
Trinity went out first as our entire development process is based around Trinity. It was based around Predator, then it went away, and since trinity is loosely based on Predator, it took over as first in line for updates/additions, based on how the engineers build stuff.
In the process of integrating 13 support to both tools, Trinity worked out really well, no issue, no surprises, and it went out the door. Plain and simple.
inTune had a few hiccups. I know for sure you guys are not here volunteering to Beta test for us, yet you want it 'now!'...well, unfortunately we are going to take the time to make it right before we put it out the door based on demands
Of course an aprox time table would be great too! 
